Scientists make breakthrough in research that could change the way our homes are constructed: mycocrete::Soon, we could be living like gnomes.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Researchers at the UK’s Newcastle University are using fungal networks (called mycelium) to build structures. The goal is to create lighter-weight buildings, reducing our reliance on concrete and lessening negative environmental impact.

    Mycelium, small strings that are part of a fungus, intertwine underground with tree roots. It’s part of a network of plants that pass water and nutrients to each other, even allowing trees to “communicate,” according to the National Forest Foundation.

    Mushrooms, the fairytale home of garden gnomes, are a byproduct that grows on the surface.

    Researchers are leveraging the growth properties of the organism to create mycocrete, an ingenious paste that, when dried, is “stronger and more versatile” than other fungi biomaterials.

    “Our ambition is to transform the look, feel and wellbeing of architectural spaces using mycelium in combination with biobased materials such as wool, sawdust, and cellulose,” Newcastle’s Dr. Jane Scott said in a university report.

    The process is quite the biology experiment. Scientists take mycelium spores and mix them with materials the spores can devour and grow on, including grains.

    This mixture is put into a mold and placed in a room that might resemble your basement right now — warm, dark, and humid. The mycelium grows to form and is dried, creating a building material that could be a cleaner fill-in for foam, timber, or plastic, per Newcastle research.

    In this innovation, the experts have improved the process by using flexible, tube-shaped knitted molds, which are hung from a frame. This allows for more oxygen to enter, helping to create what the experts call mycocrete, CleanTechnica reported.

    The team proved the concept through a unique build called , which was tested for strength, outperforming past samples. It’s a “complex freestanding dome constructed in a single piece without [joints] that could prove to be weak points, thanks to the flexible knitted form,” to Newcastle experts.

    It looks sort of like a birdcage. A university shows two people sitting inside it.

    If this fungus can prove versatile enough to replace concrete in even a portion of our buildings, the results could be impactful. Princeton University that concrete is the “most consumed” product on Earth, not counting water. The concrete industry contributes of air pollution a year, Princeton.

    The experts must create the right mycelium mix for buildings, before it goes mainstream.

    It’s “a significant result, and a step toward the use of mycelium and textile biohybrids within construction,” Scott in the university report.

  • treefrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    An article on mycelium that doesn’t call them mushroom roots!

    But then it goes on to call mushrooms byproducts… they’re fucking sex organs/fruits. No more a byproduct than penises, vaginas, sperms and eggs.

    :/

  • ComplexLotus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now I Question why this should be better than wood? While trees grow fine in nature without human presence, the Mushrooms breeding has to be closely monitored and energy has to be invested into nutrients and temperature regulation. Maybe wood and Mushrooms could be combined but I do not see this completely remove the wood use case.

    • lemick24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I had to guess the answer would be time and land usage. A single humidity and temperature controlled facility could likely produce huge amounts of densely packed mycelial wood substitute compared to a huge forestry area that takes many years.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know. There’s some new revolutionary housing material developed like every other year for the past 50 years, but nothing has changed. Seems odd.

  • Artaca@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love folks trying new stuff in the construction space. Concrete produces a lot of CO2, but it also lasts forever if you don’t demolish it. Seems like the material benefits from having forms (unless I misread it). Would be interested to see how it pairs with a modular system like ICFs (IMFs in this case I guess lol).