The PvE campaign was pitched as the sequel’s big pillar, now ex-devs tell Kotaku its future is unclear
  • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
    484·
    8 months ago

    Oh, you mean the entire “reason they HAD to make overwatch 2”?

    And yes, I know that it was actually to get people to rebuy skins that they already had and heroes that they already had

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      151·
      8 months ago

      OW2 absolutely deserves criticism but that is factually incorrect - if you had OW1, all your stuff carried over. You didn’t have to pay for anything you had previously

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      101·
      8 months ago

      Smite 2 is to make you rebuy things

      OW2 was to make things harder to obtain without spending money

      They had already cancelled the campaign a long time ago, it really pissed off the HOTS community because the dev team was taken from that game to work on that

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    36·
    8 months ago

    Fta

    Work on the campaign missions was apparently held up in pursuit of a nebulous thing called “Blizzard Quality,” a term used to describe a standard the company aspires to.

    They haven’t had that in years. Wtf.

    • Tarogar@feddit.de
      25·
      8 months ago

      Blizzard quality… Also known as generating the most money for the CEO and shareholders in recent years.

      They have not cared for their customers or employees in a long time.

  • Khalmoon@lemm.ee
    34·
    8 months ago

    Overwatch 2 successfully made me stop caring about live service games. What is blizzard doing with all that money if it’s not going into the “blizzard polish”?

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        31·
        8 months ago

        The only reliable statistics we have access to is Steam statistics, and the numbers aren’t looking great for Overwatch 2.