So confusing…

I’m trying to understand why you would need this when metrics should be exported to a centralized system which you then view with a WebUI if you need such a thing.

Basic stuff is fine, but anything video or gaming related is a struggle. I’ve also noticed the power saving benefits aren’t there.

M1 running Asahi is mostly fine. You’ll be missing some major features though, most notably the GPU hardware acceleration for certain things, and port features like Thunderbolt: https://asahilinux.org/docs/platform/feature-support/m1/#table-of-contents

Also, the leader of the project quit awhile back, and development seems somewhat stalled/slow now.

Powershell?

https://cylab.be/blog/92/measure-ambient-temperature-with-temper-and-linux

Yuuuup

I missed that you said you were using OPNsense, so the up/down would be handled there. If it’s working now, don’t worry about it.

If your routes aren’t changing, then your device, as a client, isn’t going to reach anything. You’ll need to see a route for the 10.20.0.0/24 subnet show up that points to whatever the endpoint address is on the other end.

So if that’s all your server config is, it’s only going to allow one peer at a time. You can confirm this by disconnecting your android device from the tunnel, and then connecting using the same info from your Linux device.

You also at a minimum should have PostUP and PostDown directives to properly forward incoming traffic on your wg interface.

1. what are your routes before and after connecting to the VPN?
2. You say “resolve”, do you mean by DNS, or you actually can’t ping the actual IP address once connected?
3. What is your Wireguard server config?

I don’t mean to be rude, but the last time you used a “commercial VPS” must have been a decade ago.

Get with the times.

There is not a single datacenter provider on this planet who uses VNC as anything. Every major player is working towards Zero-Trust AT BEST, so you wouldn’t even be able to leave a weird VNC port open to the internet even if you wanted to without an IDS going off.

I don’t want to spend time digging into your outdated dumbshit, so I’ll just slap it down: AWS, Google, Azure, Cloudflare…just name anyone. NOT WORKING WITH VNC.

Get current. Nobody does this old ass shit anymore. Sorry. It’s dead as fuck, guy.

I think you’re just experiencing a usable UX experience though. You’re not talking about anything except one desktop environment.

Your uptime is better. Your resource usage is more sane. Your ability to control what you do and don’t want on your machine is better.

That’s really the bigger win for you from what I’m reading.

VNC has long been abandoned by the engineering world. It’s inefficient, it has no transport security, and the implementations are very subjective.

VNC is dead. I’d try to talk them off that if it’s a requirement.

Ghost, Hugo, Jekyll…etc. all the same ones you’ll probably find by searching around.

Ghost is probably the most fleshed out if you’re looking for guardrails and a UI.

I was confused by the title because fprintd has been around for a long time. Didn’t realize Cinnamon didn’t support it.

See my other comment to you, guy. Ya blocked.

Nah, you weren’t. Nobody was using it in a “commercial setting” in 1991. In fact, it didn’t even do anything in 1991 boot sort of boot, and it had a somewhat functional input and TCP/IP stack if you were lucky enough to even keep it stable enough. People weren’t even using it in research settings in 1991 for this reason, because the very basic running kernel released in September of that year with ZERO functionality but the above.

I don’t even want to continue to railing on you, but your post history has all the facts of your first uses of Linux in between a bunch of far-right conspiracy junk, anti-vax ranting, and Doomsday Prepper thoughts, and then a bunch of overstating your expertise in seemingly everything that contradicts previous statements you change at will to make a point.

You’re just a sub-par Internet troll, guy. The fact you even asked this question is hilarious because you don’t understand the need for LTS focused releases of a distro 😂

You’re an amateur user. Engineering teams need long term and stable distributions with frequent security updates to be stable for long periods of time. That is why LTS releases exist.

How so what?

Let me pick this apart piece by piece because you don’t understand how any of this works, and for your uninformed answer from AI or Reddit:

1. A Trademark is nothing more than branding. Meaningless. The substance of the project is MIT Licensed which means…open.
2. As you can read in their Charter docs: “Many basic decisions are made through a process known as “lazy approval”, in which general consent is assumed unless valid objections are raised within a period of time…” So, no, Red Hat as an entity isn’t making decisions in the direction of the project.
3. Fedora ecosystem is one group of devs working on a specific line of tooling centered around rolling releases. Alma and Rocky have their own, which is mostly a free version of RHEL focused on LTS releases (not desktop). Two factions of the same coin with different goals.
4. In Fedora forums you’re wondering why Fedora people would suggest Fedora Server??? See #3. They have completely different use-cases and userbase.