Some middle-aged guy on the Internet. Seen a lot of it, occasionally regurgitating it, trying to be amusing and informative.

Lurked Digg until v4. Commented on Reddit (same username) until it went full Musk.

Was on kbin.social (dying/dead) and kbin.run (mysteriously vanished). Now here on fedia.io.

Really hoping he hasn’t brought the jinx with him.

Other Adjectives: Neurodivergent; Nerd; Broken; British; Ally; Leftish

  • 1 Post
  • 399 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 13th, 2024

help-circle
  • You seem to be familiar with Bash syntax. But others may not be.

    If by this you mean that the Bash syntax for doing certain things is horrible and that it could be expressed more clearly in something else, then yes, I agree, otherwise I’m not sure this is a problem on the same level as others.

    OP could pick any language and have the same problem. Except maybe Python, but even that strays into symbolic line noise once a project gets big enough.

    Either way, comments can be helpful when strange constructs are used. There are comments in my own Bash scripts that say what a line is doing rather than just why precisely because of this.

    But I think the main issue with Bash (and maybe other shells), is that it’s parsed and run line by line. There’s nothing like a full script syntax check before the script is run, which most other languages provide as a bare minimum.



  • The example picture at the top of the article is weird.

    The window title reads “nano” but the software running in the window is Pico, Nano’s now deprecated (and strangely-licenced) spiritual parent. Or it’s Nano hacked to have a Pico header which, while somewhat fitting with the theme, that would be even more weird.


  • As best as I can tell, the 22nd amendment talks about how no-one can serve more than two terms. It does not, however, give a limit on how long a second term can be.

    As such he wouldn’t need to touch that particular amendment to retain power, and so I can’t accept the bet.

    It took a minute to find the right place, but the four-year maximum term length is actually set in Article II section 1 of the Constitution proper.

    And now bear in mind that Donnie is quoted as being in favour of “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.” should the circumstances require it.

    He’s going to try it. And since he’s immune from prosecution, what’s going to be done about it if he doesn’t leave?


  • palordrolap@fedia.iotoComic Strips@lemmy.worldBirth Lottery
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If he’s still alive in 2029, there’s a good chance he’ll still be President then. And I mean after January.

    The rules that say he can’t will all be thrown out over the next four years.

    Remember in 2017 when he called Xi “king” of China? Xi apparently liked that. It doesn’t matter whether Donnie only thought Xi liked it or if he actually liked it, it showed what’s been going on in Donnie’s head.

    He wants to be king, and kings only step aside when they die.

    I say all this in the hope that I’m wrong. But I think the US will have more than an election to contest in four years’ time.


  • Illiteracy possibly. Almost certainly more people will be less able to read older texts.

    If that’s going to happen anyway, they could do worse than adopt Pinyin or some variant of it. Or they might prefer something like Bopomofo if they don’t want to use Western characters for whatever reason.

    Either way, any decision like that is likely to be 20-30 years away at minimum, and that’s assuming literacy rates start going down, which they might not. I doubt Xi gives it any thought at all.





  • Mathematics doesn’t try anything. It’s abstract. Humans try to fit mathematics to real world phenomena, often with great success, but we don’t know why things seem to work out, only that they do.

    Whether it means the universe is fundamentally mathematical is a bigger question than for both science and philosophy combined, and so mathematics is merely a useful modelling tool until we know for certain. (And we might never know.)

    The “perfect” mathematics in this case is that this planetary system has all planets in what’s called resonance, that is, the orbit time of the planets is in some relatively simple integer ratio. e.g. the innermost planet might go around twice for every once of the next furthest out (2:1), or three times for every two (3:2), etc.

    The article doesn’t give the ratios, but there is a tendency for planetary resonances to self-reinforce, that is, once nearby planets in non-resonant motion get close to an orbital resonance, there is a tendency that their orbit speeds will shift towards that resonance over time, and outside interference is usually needed to break a resonance once it has been set up.

    There was no grand mathematical plan, only an emergent phenomenon.

    Maybe this system has ended up with 32:16:8:4:2:1. That would be neat.



  • I feel like there could be a decent intermediate option here. It quickly glosses over page sizes and then talks about the modulus operator, but misses the fact that bitwise operations can emulate modulus for powers of two, which is generally the sorts of sizes that pages tend to be, and bitwise is generally much faster than the division that modulus performs.

    In short, x % z is generally equivalent to x & (z-1) when z is a power of two and is often much faster.

    Now, I get that the compiler might be clever enough to turn a modulus operation of the right size into a bitwise operation, but it’s still necessary that the programmer specify that power-of-two size for their circular buffer in the first place.

    I would be curious as to whether this “greyer” magic has any benefit when not performing the page table hack.



  • So it turns out that the word centibillonaire existed before this comic and refers to having 100 billion to 999 billion currency, despite the fact that the prefix centi- means a hundredth not a hundred times.

    By rights a centibillionaire should have between 10 million and 999 million currency, i.e. less than a billion.

    Frickin’ rich people ruining terminology. I’m still convinced that one of the reasons the US came up with the short scale system of numbering was so that a billion dollars was a somewhat achievable goal.

    “Thousand-millionaire” doesn’t have the same ring to it, after all, and “milliardaire” sounds like “millionaire” said by someone with a cold.


  • One take I saw on it was that he has no case because the local authority were not responsible for the harm caused to him, such as it is.

    Sure, he feels aggrieved because of the local authority’s refusal to accede to his demands to search the landfill, but that’s secondary. Had he never pursued it they would not have had to say no.

    In his shoes, I’d be sick to my stomach every single day, but I might have given up sooner nonetheless. I’m pretty sure that due to sheer bloodymindedness he’s now in deep with various financial backers who were hoping for a return when he succeeded… and now he owes them money.

    Basically, if this doesn’t stop him, I’m not sure he’ll ever stop trying.


  • TL;DR Only if you misunderstand the intent of the word “delete”.

    In the sense of getting rid of the sites themselves, sure, that’ll never happen.

    And in the sense that once you’re known to them you’ll never be forgotten, at least not without a massive lawsuit that you’ve little chance of winning, yes.

    But you can ask Meta to delete your account(s) and everything visibly associated with you to the point that you no longer have a presence on any of their sites, and that’s what this article is about.

    One of the reasons Meta has been creating fake AI-based accounts is because so many people are doing this and they don’t like it and want to make it look like their site is still active. Which is an excellent reason to delete your accounts, even if they weren’t also doing a bunch of other heinous things.

    And you can delete the apps from your phone. You should delete your accounts first though.




  • It doesn’t help that some of the duplicates aren’t duplicates at all but some SO admin or mod hasn’t read or understood the question properly and points the asker at something that’s actually only vaguely related or irrelevant.

    I’m pretty sure I’ve also heard of askers providing links to other questions that are similar to but not quite what they’re interested in, explained why their question is different and yet it’s one of those linked questions that ends up being identified as being identical to the asker’s question.

    There may also be at least one pair of questions that each point back at the other as being the original, and there’s no useful information in either. (I don’t know why this idea is in my head though, so maybe it was a joke I read somewhere.)

    Either way, the admins and mods there do not like to be told they are wrong and will shut things down fast if it starts looking like they’ve made a mistake. Unfortunately for them, stories like this get out anyway.

    Petty little overlords of the toxic waste dump of their own making.