Very interesting article!

  • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh for fucks sake, now the article itself has a misplaced mobile Wikipedia link and there’s nowhere I can quickly see to put my copy paste about it.

    copy paste for context:

    Please, anyone who reads this, stop posting links to the mobile version of Wikipedia. It doesn’t switch automatically on PC, and I see it happen all the time. Just take the half a second to remove the “.m” from the beginning of the link, save everyone else from the pain of having to be surprised by it and taking the time to do it themselves.

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        General infosec tip: keep your browser add-ons to the absolute minimum you can live with. Add-ons are attack vectors. The more you have - the more at risk you are. And only install the ones you have a reason to trust.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      People not having the Wikipedia app baffles me. Sharing from there gives you reasonable links.

      • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Why use an app when there’s a web site? In case of Wikipedia I fail to see any functional benefit for an app.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Better reading experience overall. Compartmentalizing all my Wikipedia reading so as not to mix it with my other many open tabs. (Wikipedia app has tabs, too.) Sections are not collapsed by default. Easier to search on the page by default than in the browser.

          I can probably go on it I made a more in-depth comparison after using the web version for a bit…

        • bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          The app has offline capabilities and to save articles on a named list. I use it as a reference when forgetting something or to save the list type article as a starting point when researching a software to use. Or just generally a reading material when on the go (yes, I find reading wikipedia articles entertaining)

            • bitfucker@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              My man, I think I have over a hundred tabs and saved wikipedia articles alone that I always refer to when needed. The app works great for me

              • Plopp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                I would assume, and hope, it works really well for such usage. I only tend to end up on Wikipedia a couple of times a week, and 95% of that is on my desktop to have a quick look at something I won’t be getting back to ever again.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Time? Pff, no clue. But I look things up all the time and don’t have time to finish articles the first time round, ever (two kids under six).

              So it’s great to have and get back to articles.