You heard him 4090 users, upgrade to a more powerful GPU.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    and no one is saying they have to, that’s my point that keeps getting overlooked. If someone wants to play sick 4k 120fps that’s awesome, but you’re going to pay a premium for that. If people are upset because they can’t play ultra settings on hardware that came out 5 years ago, to me that’s snobby behavior. The choice is either pay up for top of the line hardware, or be happy with medium settings and maybe you go back in a few years and play it on ultra.

    If the game doesn’t play at all on lower hardware (like Cyberpunk did on release), then that is not fair and needs to be addressed. The game plain did not work for lower end hardware, and that’s not fair at all, it wasn’t about how well it played, it’s that it didn’t play.

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      4k 120fps would be great

      But the 4090 only averages 75fps at 4k high preset. 7900xtx averages 74fps

      You can go skim the Gamers Nexus review of the 7700xt, it has a portion dedicated to Starfield in it.

      You need a 6700xt or 4060ti to get 60fps on high at 1080p

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk what to tell you mate, I’m on a 3080, 1440p, and I’m getting average 60fps on 1440p My settings are all ultra except for a couple, FSR on at 75% resolution scale. To me, that’s optimized, I don’t even expect 60fps on an RPG. Cyberpunk I’ve never had higher than 50.

        • Hoomod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why don’t you set it to ultra “except for a couple” until you get 60+ in cyberpunk