~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO – you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it’s not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Other Chromium-based browsers are on borrowed time. As time goes on, it will become more difficult for them to maintain v2 support.

    And Firefox won’t? I just explained why you don’t even need v2 support.

    Nobody has the resources to properly maintain a browser fork with more than minor modifications.

    Except…all of them?

    And you can bet Google will go out of their way to make this difficult for everybody else.

    If and when that becomes a problem, I can change later just like I can today… Today it is not a problem.