cross-posted from: https://lemmy.radio/post/3983333

Meshtastic – an open-source mesh networking platform redefining communication. From decentralized, long-range capabilities to versatile applications in emergency response, outdoor adventures. Discover the diverse hardware options, step-by-step setup guide, and the remarkable range of 5 KM - 10 KM.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I find it rather useless if it only supports text messaging. Why not use cb radio or whatever at that point? That seems more useful in a disaster situation.

    • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Very low cost of entry ($30-40), mesh capability for redundancy, and its on fairly accessible public bands although it occupies a specific part of it. Also it comes with end to end encryption.

      It’s just a far more cost effective solution compared to having a CB radio, where you’d need to be licensed to have certain features or to communicate on VHF/UHF etc. You also wouldn’t need to learn any sort of HAM based etiquette to operate these devices.

      Although if you need the extra capability, like voice comms, and want the flexibility that comes with HAM you can also incorporate these into that system.

        • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          If that’s the only gripe you have, then it just seems like you’re looking for reasons to not use this technology.

          That’s okay, it’s not for everyone. If you prefer to use your HAM radio, by all means feel free to do so and occupy those frequencies.

          Myself and others in the Meshtastic community will still welcome you with open arms, if and when you decide to check it out.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No I think it’s actually kinda cool, but not useful for many. That’s completely fine.

            I just wanted to point out that decentralization wasn’t an improvement over radio.

            Myself and others in the Meshtastic community will still welcome you with open arms, if and when you decide to check it out.

            awesome

            • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ahh fair enough. I can see where you’re coming from.

              I find the added redundancy to be a beneficial addition in my scenario, particularly for emergency situations where cell service is out (due to overuse/congestion).

              These don’t need multiple points of redundancy to work but it does add peace of mind imo. Decentralization is a core principle of Meshtastic so that’s also another strong point that pushed me towards the protocol.

              But I can respect not everyone has the same requirements or interests :)

    • june (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Meshtastic has the mesh capabilities that others have mentioned but what’s more immediately important is the ability to direct message others (no need to send private messages to everyone in range) and the ability to share GPS coordinates which is absolutely helpful in an emergency.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      CB doesn’t have mesh capability so the range is far more limited. Plus you may need a license to operate it.