I know MediaBiasFactCheck is not a be-all-end-all to truth/bias in media, but I find it to be a useful resource.

It makes sense to downvote it in posts that have great discussion – let the content rise up so people can have discussions with humans, sure.

But sometimes I see it getting downvoted when it’s the only comment there. Which does nothing, unless a reader has rules that automatically hide downvoted comments (but a reader would be able to expand the comment anyways…so really no difference).

What’s the point of downvoting? My only guess is that there’s people who are salty about something it said about some source they like. Yet I don’t see anyone providing an alternative to MediaBiasFactCheck…

  • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Oh, this new post already has a comment, let’s check it out! … Dang it!”

    After the third or fourth time it’s just spammy, and the bot formatting just doesn’t work on connect.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      the bot formatting just doesn’t work on connect.

      That fault lies with the Connect dev though… the formatting used on the webUI works as intended.

      • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Probably, still remains that out of all the bots I’ve seen this is the only one with format issues. I believe a minimalist approach to be preferable for bots since their goal is spreading information over a large userbase with various client, from CLI to native web page.