Advocates for the use of trigger warnings suggest that they can help people avoid or emotionally prepare for encountering content related to a past trauma. But trigger warnings may not fulfill either of these functions, according to an analysis published in Clinical Psychological Science.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026231186625

    • Kiernian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks, I was sitting here thinking the warnings were so you could AVOID shit you didn’t want to see and the headline had me questioning my perception of reality on this.

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      First sentence

      Advocates for the use of trigger warnings suggest that they can help people avoid or emotionally prepare for encountering content related to a past trauma. But trigger warnings may not fulfill either of these functions

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I think the followup is even more relevant:

        Instead, warnings appear to heighten the anticipatory anxiety a person may feel prior to viewing sensitive material while making them no less likely to consume that content

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I really doubt that it doesn’t make people less likely to consume the content. A lot of the time with NSFL stuff, you either don’t expect it or it isn’t described well enough to prepare you. I’ve seen a lot of shit that I would not have watched if there was a warning through the years, shock stuff in comments etc. And I’ve chosen to not watch stuff that had a warning many times, and often see comments saying they won’t watch it either.