• Silverseren@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, even if it had done well, I feel like they would still be laying people off anyways, just to pad out their end of year revenue presentations.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every time. Seems more like companies aren’t “hit with” them at all, more like… They “get to participate” or “decide to indulge” in layoffs.

      • Silverseren@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, “hit with” has always been bizarre passive voice wording. The executives in charge were the ones who actively decided to lay off people.