Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

  • Skua@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a reason I said “they should be made to be more ethical” and not just “they should be more ethical”. I know that they aren’t going to do it themselves and I’ll support well-written regulations on them.

    but it doesn’t matter for this discussion.

    Isn’t it what almost your entire comment was about?

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The argument was basically “that is how humans learn too”. I accepted that analogy because it doesn’t change my conclusion that AI can’t be copyrighted. Had the discussion been about something else I wouldn’t have accepted that argument.