Four more large Internet service providers told the US Supreme Court this week that ISPs shouldn’t be forced to aggressively police copyright infringement on broadband networks.

While the ISPs worry about financial liability from lawsuits filed by major record labels and other copyright holders, they also argue that mass terminations of Internet users accused of piracy “would harm innocent people by depriving households, schools, hospitals, and businesses of Internet access.” The legal question presented by the case “is exceptionally important to the future of the Internet,” they wrote in a brief filed with the Supreme Court on Monday.

  • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think it is also the user they disconnect for piracy tend to pay more. They tend to be more premium customers also why should they enforce what happens on their lines. It is an illegal search and seizure. Let the government get a warrant prove something is illegal then the ISP can disconnect them.

    • Graphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah who else is going to pay for 1GB speeds knowing the most they’ll ever get is 400MB