Accordingly, an author’s decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.
US Supreme Court, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (1995)
A quick skim says anonymity is protected under it, with exceptions. Mostly for criminal acts. Particularly here, if the leaked artwork falls under “intellectual property” then the exception applies and anonymity isn’t protected.
Is there any validity to this theory?
I never heard anonymity being protected by 1st AM
US Supreme Court, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (1995)
More:
https://epic.org/issues/democracy-free-speech/anonymity/
A quick skim says anonymity is protected under it, with exceptions. Mostly for criminal acts. Particularly here, if the leaked artwork falls under “intellectual property” then the exception applies and anonymity isn’t protected.
The regime works in mysterious ways