Inspired by true events from this morning

  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I want to note that you’d need about $143 in gross sales to meet the threshold of $100 in net profit.

    On the surface that sounds like a lot. But, they’re providing a service without any guarantee of any income. Epic can only compete because they’ve few users and are willing to operate at a near loss in attempt to garner market share.

    This will be a difficult one for others to understand as a “good deal”. Gamers are usually correct when they pull out their pitchforks. This should not be one of those times.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Epic can only compete because they’ve few users and are willing to operate at a near loss

      Bullshit. Epic’s loses are in paying for exclusives and giving away games while ruining their PR.

      Steam could operate at 15% if they wanted to. But… why would they do that?

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Neither is publicly traded. Neither of us know the numbers.

        Does Steam make money on hosting indie games?

        How does one research such a question?

        I don’t need answers. I had them before I made my second post above.

        Good luck to you.