I’m going to move away from lastpass because the user experience is pretty fucking shit. I was going to look at 1pass as I use it a lot at work and so know it. However I have heard a lot of praise for BitWarden and VaultWarden on here and so probably going to try them out first.

My questions are to those of you who self-host, firstly: why?

And how do you mitigate the risk of your internet going down at home and blocking your access while away?

BitWarden’s paid tier is only $10 a year which I’m happy to pay to support a decent service, but im curious about the benefits of the above. I already run syncthing on a pi so adding a password manager wouldn’t need any additional hardware.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.netEnglish
    571·
    1 month ago

    I use KeePassXC and use syncthing to sync the database to each devise I own. This way I always have the newest version if the database everywhere and don’t need to worry about Internet access at all.

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.socialEnglish
          1·
          1 month ago

          KeePassXC can’t be run in headless mode, and the GUI is tightly coupled to the app. You have to have all of X installed, and have a display running, to run it.

          Here’s the runtime dependencies of KeePassXC:

          linux-vdso.so.1
libQt5Svg.so.5
libqrencode.so.4
libQt5Concurrent.so.5
libpcsclite.so.1
libargon2.so.1
libQt5Network.so.5
libQt5Widgets.so.5
libbotan-3.so.5
libz.so.1
libminizip.so.1
libQt5DBus.so.5
libusb-1.0.so.0
libQt5X11Extras.so.5
libQt5Gui.so.5
libQt5Core.so.5
libX11.so.6
libstdc++.so.6
libm.so.6
libgcc_s.so.1
libc.so.6
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
libgssapi_krb5.so.2
libproxy.so.1
libssl.so.3
libcrypto.so.3
libbz2.so.1.0
liblzma.so.5
libsqlite3.so.0
libdbus-1.so.3
libudev.so.1
libGL.so.1
libpng16.so.16
libharfbuzz.so.0
libmd4c.so.0
libsystemd.so.0
libdouble-conversion.so.3
libicui18n.so.75
libicuuc.so.75
libpcre2-16.so.0
libzstd.so.1
libglib-2.0.so.0
libxcb.so.1
libkrb5.so.3
libk5crypto.so.3
libcom_err.so.2
libkrb5support.so.0
libkeyutils.so.1
libresolv.so.2
libpxbackend-1.0.so
libgobject-2.0.so.0
libcap.so.2
libGLdispatch.so.0
libGLX.so.0
libfreetype.so.6
libgraphite2.so.3
libicudata.so.75
libpcre2-8.so.0
libXau.so.6
libXdmcp.so.6
libcurl.so.4
libgio-2.0.so.0
libduktape.so.207
libffi.so.8
libbrotlidec.so.1
libnghttp3.so.9
libnghttp2.so.14
libidn2.so.0
libssh2.so.1
libpsl.so.5
libgmodule-2.0.so.0
libmount.so.1
libbrotlicommon.so.1
libunistring.so.5
libblkid.so.1

          I don’t know why it links to a systemd library. Here are the runtime dependencies of rook:

          linux-vdso.so.1
libresolv.so.2
libc.so.6
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2

          Don’t get me wrong: KeePassXC is one of my favorite programs. But don’t leave it running all the time, and it can’t be run on headless systems.

            • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.socialEnglish
              1·
              1 month ago

              I use it for everything, but then, I wrote it. All of the desktop secret service tools have desktop dependencies (Gnome’s uses Gnome libraries, KDE’s pulls some KDE libraries) and run through DBUS; since I don’t use a DE, it’s a fair bit of unnecessary bloat. And I don’t like GUI apps that just hang around in the background consuming resources. I open KeePassXC when I need to make changes to the DB, and then I shut it down. Otherwise, it hangs out in my task bar, distracting me.

              Rook is for people who want to run on headless systems, or want to minimize resources usage, or don’t use a desktop environment (such as Gnome or KDE), or don’t run DBUS, or don’t run systemd. It’s for people who don’t want a bunch of applications running in the background in their task bar. KeePassXC providing a secret service is great, but it’s overkill if that’s most of what it’s providing for you, most of the time.

              I don’t think took is for everyone, or even for most people. It’s for people who like to live mostly in the command line, or even in VTs.

    • dan@upvote.auEnglish
      3·
      1 month ago

      don’t need to worry about Internet access at all.

      For what it’s worth, Bitwarden caches the database for offline use, so it works fine without internet access too. When you get internet access again, it’ll sync with the server.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      1 month ago

      this is what I do as well, along with file staging so if I corrupt it by accident I don’t lose the entire DB

      Currently I have it on my server as grab only, and then normal access on my clients with staging