CodyIT@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoOOP is not that badosa1.netexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down18
arrow-up149arrow-down1external-linkOOP is not that badosa1.netCodyIT@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·edit-22 months agoI love working in OOP. It’s true that it’s not always the best solution for every project, but damn if it isn’t nice when it is.
minus-squareHawk@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 months agoI’ve always had an easier time jumping into an oop code base, then eg a lisp one. I hear people when they say they don’t want their data mixed in with their logic but The pressure to structure code Is very nice.
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months ago The pressure to structure code Is very nice. That is a great point. It’s interesting how our tools influence our designs, and OOP does force some thought to go into having an intentional structure.
I love working in OOP. It’s true that it’s not always the best solution for every project, but damn if it isn’t nice when it is.
I’ve always had an easier time jumping into an oop code base, then eg a lisp one.
I hear people when they say they don’t want their data mixed in with their logic but The pressure to structure code Is very nice.
That is a great point. It’s interesting how our tools influence our designs, and OOP does force some thought to go into having an intentional structure.