This article boils down to “man enables feature, is slightly surprised when feature functions.”
Ars is usually better than this. Disappointing
For some reason the author is trying to equate it to an “AI-Mediated breakup” which…doesn’t make sense, a summary of something is not “mediating”
Mediating would be like having the AI write and deliver a breakup text, simply summarizing it isn’t
deleted by creator
To be fair the ‘dystopian’ quote is from the guy that got broken up with, not ARS’ article writer.
I don’t think that’s the part they took issue with.
Is an AI summary of a text message really something you need? I’d have thought a typical text would be short enough to not require it.
It’s summarized an any “stack” of notifications. So a bunch of messages from the same group chat, or a single app sending you a bunch of notifications, etc.
I’ve only been trying it for like 48 hours, but so far I’m impressed considering this is a local LLM running on my phone.
I have a boss who sends the most rambly incoherent emails I’ve ever encountered from anyone. Yet when he sends a text (It’s really WhatsApp but same difference) it’s basically four words.
People do not really like typing on phones so they tend not to leave long messages
I think the intended use case is summarising a series of messages, not just one
“I do feel like it added a level of distance to it that wasn’t a bad thing,” he told Ars Technica. “Maybe a bit like a personal assistant who stays professional and has your back even in the most awful situations, but yeah, more than anything it felt unreal and dystopian.”
If the single word “dystopian” is how the editors decided to summarize that description, I’m not sure they’re doing any better than the AI.
Dystopia is when optional feature is enabled
“About a week later right out of the blue she sends me a John Deere letter… Yeah I called her. She gave me a bunch of crap about not listening to her enough. I dunno. I wasn’t really paying attention.”
That John Denver’s full of shit man
I think a John Deere letter may be different.
So the complaint here is that Apple’s AI summary… Accurately and succinctly summarised his messages, as he requested?
We reached out to Spreen directly via email and he delivered his own summary of his girlfriend’s messages. “It was something along the lines of i can’t believe you just did that, we’re done, i want my stuff. we had an argument in a bar and I got up and left, then she sent the text,” he wrote.
How did he feel about getting the news via AI summary? “I do feel like it added a level of distance to it that wasn’t a bad thing,” he told Ars Technica. “Maybe a bit like a personal assistant who stays professional and has your back even in the most awful situations, but yeah, more than anything it felt unreal and dystopian.”
This really is just more funny than anything else to me. Sucks it was on his birthday, though.
“we had an argument in a bar and I got up and left, then she sent the text,”
If you abandon your girl in a bar, you should absolutely expect to lose her, birthday or not. She is under no obligation at that point to consider his feelings about his special day.
You know no details about their relationship at all.
Perhaps she was being truly awful to him, and that prompted him to leave. We don’t know.
But fuck off with that implication that women are weak and pathetic, needing a man around to protect them. If someone is being awful, you can leave. Doesn’t matter what they’ve got between their legs.
If a woman I was with was being awful to me in a bar, of course I’d leave. She’s an adult. She can deal with the consequences of her own actions, and she can look after herself. I’m not above her, needing to be her guardian figure, just because I have a cock and she doesn’t. What a 1950s attitude.
“She found the Tinder messages; you’re cooked bro”
