This is the question that should’ve been asked before it was built and shipped.

Now that it has been, though, any effort to keep it out of landfill and find a use for the hardware is good.

He does. And not one trained on a particularly good model, it has to be said.

Ok, so you meant Lemmy.

The person who asked the question is very well aware they are accessing Lemmy via an internet-connected device.

What does that have to do with asking if you can have a cloud-hosted Immich instance?

Additionally, how does it prove he’s a bot (which you have asserted) or that they’re a shill sent here, which you’ve also asserted?

I don’t know whether you yourself are a bot trained on a very bad model, or whether you’re simply extremely inebriated, because you’re not making much sense.

Get where? Lemmy?

What are you even talking about?

It’s perfectly possible someone doesn’t want to:

• Buy and run a whole separate PC

• Figure out how to install TrueNAS and configure it properly

• Install and configure Immich

• Figure out how to make it accessible outside of their home network while maintaining security

• Come up with an effective backup solution

• Do regular maintenance and replace hardware when required

Why are Lemmy users so incapable of realising others may have different preferences and priorities?

Not everyone can be arsed with the complexity or hours of work the above entails. Not everyone has the money for it.

I self host but I can definitely appreciate why people would prefer going a different route. It’d likely have saved me a lot of money, tbh.

It isn’t an OLED screen. It’s an E-ink one. I don’t know where you got this idea that it’s an OLED from.

TVs generally don’t come with unlocked bootloaders. That shit is locked down big time.

That would certainly be ideal, although there’s great difficulty in finding 50"+ monitors, and they cost a huge amount more

Sad people buy more to try to make themselves happy. Retail therapy.

People who serve ads have a vested interest in knowing when you’re unhappy and what makes you unhappy, so they can capitalise on it.

Jaguar Land Rover may be owned by Tata, an Indian financial holding company, but they’re still based in the UK, designed in the UK, built in the UK.

That was broadly the same for Mini too until the most recent generation, where the EV version is actually a Chinese car.

You’re talking about a very different situation to the one I am talking about. I never advocated for companies buying up exclusivity deals, particularly not when the development was done by publicly-owned institutions. I’m not sure where you got that from, because it sure as shit wasn’t from anything I wrote.

I agree it’s the world we should live in. But it’s not exactly realistic. And I’d rather discuss ways we can make our lives materially better as opposed to self-flagellation over a perfect solution while mocking anybody who proposes an imperfect but better-than-status-quo solution.

There is so many people letting perfect be the enemy of good on Lemmy.

Charge parents with neglect if they should have been expected to notice and respond to problems. That should be a jailable offense.

Great, send everyone to jail. Overcrowd prisons and put children into care. All because a parent let their child on social media…

I’m more saying the age limit is clumsy here

It isn’t. We have age limits for all kinds of things. How should this be any different?

Social media is completely different though, since parents are in direct control of the devices their kids have access to at home, and what’s available on their home network. Parents have the power to handle this themselves, so they should be expected to do so.

Parents can also control whether children buy alcohol, yet we still have restrictions on children.

I guess it would also signal to Lenovo that Fedora laptops are welcomed

I know. It effectively means you pay $211 for Windows

Which is is such a high dollar count that this simply cannot be USD, a theory further corroborated by the time being 24-hour format, which is uncommon in the US.

I was simply curious to what type of dollar it is in the image. Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, something else?

$211?!

Surely that can’t be US dollars, that’d be wild. The 24-hour clock also has me thinking this isn’t the US.

Looking at the UK site, I’d 100% go for “No Operating System”, then install Fedora Workstation anyway.

The whole point of Paint and Notepad is that they’re extremely simple and no-frills.

If MS really wants to add this bloat, it should be to their Office suite.

It’s certainly less stable than Gnome or Cinnamon, but to be fair, Plasma 6 is very stable compared to Plasma 4 and how Plasma 5 was for a long while.

I use Gnome on my PCs usually, but Plasma probably seems a lot more familiar to people who are used to Windows, which I imagine was a consideration.

It’s not fiction, that’s the reality.

Profit is a purely ideological drive, medicine and healthcare do not need profits to exist.

No shit. Everyone knows that. But it does exist. That’s the world we live in. Income tax doesn’t need to exist, but it does, and things would go wrong if you suddenly stopped paying it.

Moderna did not single handedly make the covid vaccine

Who said they did? Many companies did, and some had government or university help.

I can go deeper if you want

Go as deep as you like. I’ve already explained the situation, though.

I am speaking in good faith. How do you go about avoiding companies simply refusing to create new medications when they know for a fact making new ones would cost billions and they’d never get the money back?

I don’t like that that’s the situation. I want companies to make medications and sell them at a loss, but that’s a fantasy world. I’m being pragmatic. We can improve IP laws without completely killing off future medicine development.

“Just, like, don’t make profit, broooo” would be nice, but that’s not how the world works.

Why is Nvidia saying that Nvidia will be building these chips in the US, when they are actually being manufactured at TSMC Fab 21 in Arizona?

All these news articles, and Nvidia themselves, seems to be stating that Nvidia is not only a fab company now, but is on bleeding edge nodes.

Bad reporting, or trying to trick potential stock investors into thinking Nvidia is a hell of a lot more capable than they actually are as a means to drive up stock prices?