• SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      3 months ago

      while funny, it would cause me so many headaches either directly or indirectly that is completely cancels out

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m pretty sure our site uses a CDN that is .io so that going to be interesting.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      One of our spinoff companies wants to act so badly like a start up and be edgy they moved everything to a .io domain. This would be icing on the cake for how cowboy they manage everything.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yes, there is laws, IANA says that ideally in 3-5 years all the .io will be gone, like the .yu ones, they do not exist anymore.

    • coolmojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      The .su domain is still active and the Soviet Union does not exist for more than 30 years now.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I doubt it. The cited precedent of .yu didn’t have a ton of big international commercial interest, but .io does.

      They will absolutely find a rationale to change what io means when ISO retires io. The “laws” will be tweaked, ignored, or loopholed around.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’re not laws anyway. They are just things that ICANN say. It’s very easy to change the rules it’s not like they have to be consulted on or anything

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Jesus Christ this will be a major pain in the ass if it goes through… I’m really not in the mood of having to reconfigure all my self hosted services to a new domain.

    • gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do it anyway. Having anything behind a TLD that is tied to the political control of a tiny geographic area is insanely careless

      • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Maybe, but I had no idea this was tied to a country. I thought it was a novelty tld, like xyz and art. You know, like input/output so io.

        • gencha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, I’ve been with you. I owned a couple .so from Somalia for a while. They cranked up the cost to $$$ and I had to cancel it. I’m not a smartass, I just burned myself already in the past

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That assumption is exactly why tons of techbros jumped on it. But no, it’s for the British Indian Ocean Territory. Roughly 23 square miles of islands all within pissing distance of each other south of India.

  • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m surprised it’s not mentioned in the article, but also complicating this situation is the Chagos refugees seeking to take control of the TLD and/or receive reparations from the current registrar.

  • guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Really not looking forward to the idea of github.io links all becoming dead. So many repos with documentation at a github.io URL, with those links spread all across plaintext files and Stack Overflow and forums

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      They do, that’s why this is an issue in the first place. The purpose of ccTLDs is to host domains associated with a particular country. If the country stops existing, there’s no reason to use that country’s ccTLD. The problem is they let anyone register domains under this ccTLD even if they have no association with that country, hence the situation we’re in.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actually I believe you had to be a British national to register. Well at least you’re supposed to be a British national I’m not sure how much they checked.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Zero checking. Anyone can register a .io. You can go register one right now in 5 minutes if you wanted.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Some amount of organization is a good thing for many reasons. Think of an analogy to roads where basic traffic rules allow everyone the freedom to travel wherever and however but subject to the rules of locales. Feel free to pick your own domain within any generally recognized top level domain, according to the rules established by that tld.

      In particular, two character top level domains are reserved for ownership by specific countries. They get to say who can have a presence there, under what standards, and they deserve any profit made from that. This was a way of giving everyone a voice, to expand it beyond the us, to give many interests their own home

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The article said companies profit from it, so their prediction is no. It’s just an opinion, and not supported by any legal or diplomatic action in the article.

      My opinion is it should cease to exist. Two letter domains are country codes and IANA policy is it should match a list maintained by the UN. IANA has no business deciding for itself and has said it doesn’t want to, and they’re opening themselves to all sorts of liability and complications should they stray from that. If the UN no longer says its a valid country, it needs to no longer be a country code domain, and that’s too bad for any companies speculating on its future

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I did read the article. The answer is inconclusive not an definitive no.

      According to all the rules it should stop existing, taking common sense into account it’ll carry on. Thing is it remains to be seen where the common sense will be taken into account. Common sense isn’t all that common.