As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Losing the election is the only kind of accountability Harris and the Democrats are likely to face for their part in the genocide. Otherwise, what incentive is there for either party to ever oppose it? What message would Americans be sending to the world that we would keep in office someone who’s been actively supporting a genocide?

    • chaos@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you think electing Trump will be read as “wow, the US is taking a principled stance on Palestinian rights” by the world?

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      What message would we be sending if our replacement for them is a guy that wants Isreal to “finish the job” with it? Killing fewer people matters more than accountability

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is not a big difference between one who say finish the job and one who doesn’t say it but give every resources for Israel to finish the job

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The message would be that voting Americans are not okay with genocide. Harris is actually culpable, while the idea that Trump would be significantly worse for the Palestinians and Lebanese is just hypothetical. Trump is actually the lesser of two evils this time. The allegations against him don’t amount to genocide by a long shot.