Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 11 days agoIf Trump wins the election thru fraud how can the democrats refute it and prove they won? Or will it just be like another Jan 6 and four years of whining like Trump?message-squaremessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1237arrow-down124
arrow-up1213arrow-down1message-squareIf Trump wins the election thru fraud how can the democrats refute it and prove they won? Or will it just be like another Jan 6 and four years of whining like Trump?Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 11 days agomessage-square101fedilink
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-210 days agoYou know how people outside the USA vote? They go there, show their ID, get a tick on the list of voters, and do the voting.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·10 days agoInteresting, given the stories of people voting several times by just going to different places.
minus-squareFreakinSteve@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 days ago“stories”. Yes. Fascist media is full of stories.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 days agoYes, and again, it’s all based on trust.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 days agoHow is trust involved in that process?
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoCan you prove that your vote was counted and that the number of votes for your candidate went up by one as a result? If you can’t prove it, then it’s based on trust.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoThat’s on the level of “everything could be made up to fool me” or matrix kind of stuff. You can simply be a poll worker yourself.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoHardly. Historically there has been a lot of cheating in elections. Look at Chicago up to the 1970s. Election fraud was common there. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1973/05/08/how-the-chicago-tribune-exposed-city-vote-fraud-in-1972-and-won-a-pulitzer-prize/ Nobody can prove that there’s less cheating in Chicago elections today than in the 1970s, but people trust that it’s more honest.
You know how people outside the USA vote? They go there, show their ID, get a tick on the list of voters, and do the voting.
Same as inside the USA.
Interesting, given the stories of people voting several times by just going to different places.
“stories”. Yes. Fascist media is full of stories.
Yes, and again, it’s all based on trust.
How is trust involved in that process?
Can you prove that your vote was counted and that the number of votes for your candidate went up by one as a result? If you can’t prove it, then it’s based on trust.
That’s on the level of “everything could be made up to fool me” or matrix kind of stuff. You can simply be a poll worker yourself.
Hardly. Historically there has been a lot of cheating in elections. Look at Chicago up to the 1970s. Election fraud was common there.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/1973/05/08/how-the-chicago-tribune-exposed-city-vote-fraud-in-1972-and-won-a-pulitzer-prize/
Nobody can prove that there’s less cheating in Chicago elections today than in the 1970s, but people trust that it’s more honest.