Search for F-35B Lightning II fighter jet focused on two lakes after Marine Corps pilot ejected over North Charleston for unknown reason

US military officials have appealed to the public for help to find a fighter jet after losing track of it somewhere over South Carolina when the pilot ejected.

A Marine Corps pilot safely escaped the F-35B Lightning II jet over North Charleston on Sunday afternoon after a “mishap”, military officials said, and the search for his missing aircraft was now focused on two lakes north of North Charleston.

The pilot parachuted safely into North Charleston at about 2pm and was taken to a local hospital, where he was in stable condition, said Maj Melanie Salinas. The pilot’s name has not been released.

Based on the missing plane’s location and trajectory, the search for the F-35 Lightning II jet was focused on Lake Moultrie and Lake Marion, said Senior Master Sergeant Heather Stanton at Joint Base Charleston. Both lakes are north of North Charleston.

Local congresswoman Nancy Mace said: “How in the hell do you lose an F-35? How is there not a tracking device and we’re asking the public to what, find a jet and turn it in?”

A South Carolina Law Enforcement Division helicopter joined the search for the F-35 after some bad weather cleared in the area, Stanton said.

Officials are still investigating why the pilot ejected, authorities said.

The pilot of a second F-35 returned safely to Joint Base Charleston, Salinas said.

The planes and pilots were with the Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501 based in Beaufort, not far from South Carolina’s Atlantic coast.


archive: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/vNlJ2

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Local congresswoman Nancy Mace said: “How in the hell do you lose an F-35? How is there not a tracking device and we’re asking the public to what, find a jet and turn it in?”

    No expert, but I’d think tracking devices on military equipment would be a pretty bad idea… especially if you can’t guarantee who else can pick up those signals.

    • hotdaniel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The tracking device should be activated by remote encrypted signal. Then the F35 can passively listen before activating. Basically, the military needs to wander around the parking lot pressing their fob until the jet beeps its horn.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are EPIRBs that have impact switches and will activate in the event of a crash, but aren’t meant to work underwater.

      Big passenger jets have an underwater beacon of some type.

      • Teppic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even that might not be ideal on military equipment. In a war zone if your plane goes down you don’t want to advertise to the enemy where to find it and the pilot.

    • C_Spinoff@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was no need to look for her affiliation after reading this reaction. Extremely professional and totally level headed, maybe she felt just like in a sitcom where they turn to the camera and say stuff like this before the laugh track comes.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, that explains the F-35 I saw on Craigslist. I thought the price seemed a little high since it “may have some minor flood damage”.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m confused why they don’t know why the pilot ejected, can’t they ask him, is he unconscious, does the plane not send back telemetry data?

    Also it’s in the lake, it’s obviously in the lake because it was anywhere else would be fireball. So what the hell is the public going to do, turn up with a massive metal detector?

    There are so many questions this story raises and none of them are answered.

    • warbond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The reason the pilot ejected is unknown to the publication, not the military.
      Also, it looks like the entire article is based on a boilerplate tweet informing the public that an investigation is underway, everybody’s safe, and if you have information please contact them.
      If you want to write a click-bait article based on no information, this is how you do it.

    • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Planes can and often do land themselves without pilots on board. It’s not a graceful setdown, but it’s far from guaranteed to be a fireball. They just gradually lose altitude until they reach the ground, which if it is sufficiently flat, they then scuff across until they come to a stop.

      • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not how it works for jets, where losing your engine is pretty much a guaranteed crash.

        Regular (e.g. passenger) planes have massive wings that work with the air to keep the plane in the air efficiently, at the cost of maneuverability.

          • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Planes often land gracefully without pilots on board”

            Doubt a jet would do that, with or without an engine

          • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most new jets are fly by wire (f35 is one of these, where as the link you posted was about an aircraft which was not), they are inherently aerodynamically unstable, below a certain speed it’s just gonna stall and crash not glide to the ground. We use computers to manage the instability as the instability aids in maneuverability. Passenger planes and the like are not designed like this, so they can, in theory, just glide down, but the glide slope is what will determine if it’s gonna be a soft or deadly landing.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but they’re going to hit some bumpy ground or a tree or a car or a cow or a house or something. It’s not exactly a flat landscape up there