alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 3 days agoIntel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recoverwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down11
arrow-up1132arrow-down1external-linkIntel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recoverwww.tomshardware.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 3 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareonlinepersona@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down20·edit-23 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squaredubyakay@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoQ: how do you remain competitive against your competitors if those have the backing of an entire nation behind them? A: you don’t.
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoAMD should be the next monopoly. Let Intel die in peace.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·3 days agoThere free market is when corpo fucks you. When corpo fucks up, it is your job in inject capital but obviously with out any equity becuase that would be communism 🤡
Removed by mod
Q: how do you remain competitive against your competitors if those have the backing of an entire nation behind them?
A: you don’t.
AMD should be the next monopoly. Let Intel die in peace.
There free market is when corpo fucks you. When corpo fucks up, it is your job in inject capital but obviously with out any equity becuase that would be communism 🤡