alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 2 months agoIntel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recoverwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1136arrow-down11
arrow-up1135arrow-down1external-linkIntel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recoverwww.tomshardware.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 2 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months agoIntel silicon has historically had a lot of “bugs”…
minus-squareMettled@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoEvery and any hardware manufacturer can or has.
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoWhat he means is the feature of having a lightweight OS with no documentation running under the OS you as a customer is running. https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/s/c6bhbowtrf
Intel silicon has historically had a lot of “bugs”…
Every and any hardware manufacturer can or has.
What he means is the feature of having a lightweight OS with no documentation running under the OS you as a customer is running.
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/s/c6bhbowtrf