• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Hey… that just gave me a small idea… what if we made a “flock” or “herd” of Mastodon servers? The group of servers would all federate with each other, have the same block and allow lists, moderation policy and teams spread throughout them.

    When you make an account you can be assigned a random instance name within the flock. If your instance goes down you could still possibly log in using other servers? Main benefit would be spreading server costs and maintenance effort and de-centralized operating, but still keep a centralized feel to it?

    • Gregor@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If they have the same people running all of them, how is that different from running a single mastodon server in kubernetes, so that it doesn’t get overloaded?

    • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Honestly that’s probably the best sort of solution. A group that has some minimum standards of moderation and maintenance/upgrade management plan and just evenly distribute the load as people arrive.

      Then as a second phase make it easy to transfer, that way at the point the user gets comfortable they can easily swap to a better* “home” for those that care, for those that don’t, make the server choice be virtually invisible.