MattW03@lemmy.ca to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agoPurposelemmy.caimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1575arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1571arrow-down1imagePurposelemmy.caMattW03@lemmy.ca to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·25 days agoOriginal is 1.47mb. OP’s is 0.47mb. That’s about 3x smaller and it’s a significant difference in clarity. It’s fine if that doesn’t matter to you, but don’t spew shitty info just because you don’t care about the difference.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down5·25 days agoOP’s pic was fine, the quality was good enough for what it is, and it only used 1/3 of the space and bandwidth on the server.
minus-squareBenFranklinsDick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-225 days ago“Won’t anyone think of the bandwidth of the poor server?” Screw that, give us the high quality stuff. Shit would almost fit onto a floppy disk. 1.47mb is nothing.
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·25 days agoQuality snob* here Totally fine *not really, just reverse image search JPG’d images and post originals when I notice something’s ugly
Original is 1.47mb. OP’s is 0.47mb. That’s about 3x smaller and it’s a significant difference in clarity.
It’s fine if that doesn’t matter to you, but don’t spew shitty info just because you don’t care about the difference.
OP’s pic was fine, the quality was good enough for what it is, and it only used 1/3 of the space and bandwidth on the server.
“Won’t anyone think of the bandwidth of the poor server?”
Screw that, give us the high quality stuff. Shit would almost fit onto a floppy disk. 1.47mb is nothing.
Quality snob* here
Totally fine
*not really, just reverse image search JPG’d images and post originals when I notice something’s ugly