Note that accounts on both networks must follow the main bridge account to work.

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      We have that, it’s called ActivityPub. BlueSky wouldn’t want that tho, they couldn’t control the entire network then, after all.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        If the BlueSky protocol offers tangible benefits over ActivityPub, the BlueSky protocol could become the basis for ActivityPub 2.0. I don’t know much about the details, though.

        • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          The BlueSky protocol relies on central servers tho, I’m not sure if there’s much that ActivityPub can take inspiration from

          • Twoafros@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Non technical person here, I would love to hear more about how decentralized (or not decentralized) the Bluesky protocol is compared to ActivityPub