Nothing more disappointing to me than seeing a game I might enjoy… and then it’s only available on PC on Epic Games store. Why can’t it be available on Epic, Xbox game store and Steam? It’s so annoying, like you have no choice but to use Epic… which I would literally do ANYTHING not to use.

  • stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 days ago

    One of the annoying thing about epic exclusives is that the focus is on steam, but GOG is affected too and loses out on games too until the deal expires.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Steam is their scapegoat, they want a Monopoly without having to say they have a Monopoly.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        9 days ago

        Wait, who want a monopoly? Epic? The Epic store is like a tenth of Steam’s size, and most of that is down to Fortnite alone. Hard to have a monopoly when you’re struggling to break double digit share.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          … right, which is why I said they want a monopoly, not that they have a monopoly.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            9 days ago

            Well, yeah, presumably they all do. I’m sure the kebab place next door would love to have a monopoly, it just doesn’t look like it’s in the cards, you know?

            • Zorque@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Yes, and if the kebab store pitched a fit every time someone provided a better product than them, calling that competition a monopolist, I’d have the same criticism of that kebab shop.

              If they’re just doing their best to provide a quality product… I wouldn’t like that they have a monopoly, but if they’re not in any way abusing it… that sounds like they’ve earned their place. The problem lies in the people not putting forth enough effort (despite have the resources to do so) to match.

              • stardust@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 days ago

                Kebab store if they were epic like in their strategy would not be throwing a fit, but making exclusivity deals with suppliers so that their competitors in the area lose access to them. So trying to increase consumers having to go to their kebab store to get specific meals due to inability of other stores to offer it or not retain the same quality anymore. Also look into regulations to try and prevent potential competitors from opening up next to them or at least delay when they can open.

                  • stardust@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    They give out free samples though once a week to try to get people to buy their food. People prefer the other kebab store down the block though when it comes to spending on meals.

              • MudMan@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                9 days ago

                No, that’s not how that works at all. Monopolies are bad (and indeed unlawful) even if people think you got them by being super cool.

                Google didn’t get a monopoly on advertising and search by sucking at it. They had the best search engine and design in a crowded market and that’s why you don’t say you “Altavista’d” something. But that’s still a bad thing and they still should get broken up into manageable chunks, as current regulators are trying to do. Ditto for Apple and all these other oligopolistic online companies.

                And… you know, Valve. Maybe. At some point. Not quite there yet. But that’s bad even if you like Steam or if they have the better feature set. Which they do. Especially if they have the better feature set, in fact, because like all these other oligopolistic companies, the more time they have to establish dominance and get people to sink further into their ecosystem the harder it is to break it up later. That’s true of kebabs AND software platforms.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        9 days ago

        The company providing an actual alternative to steam’s real monopoly is not the one to be complaining about

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Are they providing an actual alternative, or just creating a pseudo alternative then bitching about how someone else gets more attention?

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              9 days ago

              Anyone believing Steam isn’t a monopoly is seriously uninformed on the topic or letting their enjoy enjoyment of the platform cloud their view of reality.

              While it sucks to have games get exclusivity agreements with EGS when EGS sucks compared to Steam, it doesn’t suddenly mean that Steam isn’t a monopoly.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well, yeah, but if I was going to get pissed about that, then Epic would be way low in my list of priorities. It’s Steam sucking up all the oxygen in that particular room. I own every Yakuza game they made available on GOG and they’ve stopped doing that. That wasn’t Epic.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 days ago

          Oh, it was Sega. That’s the thing about having an entrenched dominant position, you don’t need to invest money to get exclusives, even when you are paying out a smaller share.

          Gaben may be a libertarian, but I’m not. If you set up systemic reasons why I’m getting boned it’s still your fault.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            So the systemic reason of… providing a quality storefront? Are you demanding that they just make things shittier so that other people have a chance?

            This has got to be the most twisted criticism of Steam I’ve ever heard…

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 days ago

              I… wait, what?

              So are you okay with exclusives but only when the developer is not getting paid for it? Or only when it’s on Steam because you just happen to like Steam?

              That’s such a weird take. It owns the inconsistency so thoroughly I have trouble navigating it.

              Since apparently I have to explain this for some reason, I don’t particularly like exclusives in general and prefer platform-agnostic games so I can pick where to get them. but if you’re only going to support a store, I’m perfectly fine with developers getting paid by Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, Valve, Epic or whever else. You do you and keep your workers employed any way you see fit.

              And when I get a choice I tend to pick GOG because… well, they don’t need a little reminder that you’re not buying the game you’re buying in the payment page, so I get to back up my installers and keep them forever.

              Now, THAT is a criticsm of Steam that I’m actually making here.

              • stardust@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 days ago

                I generally am less bothered by exclusives that are a result of a company deciding to not release at a certain storefront as opposed to being bribed and contractually prevented from releasing elsewhere after signing. Those at least have a chance of being released somewhere else if they change their mind.

                Like Yakuza was a console exclusive for a long time but not because Sony forced them to. So when they decided PC games was worth venturing into they ended up doing so as opposed to being contractually prevented. Same goes for Persona.

                That’s the difference from contract based exclusives.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  They all have a chance at getting re-released later, unless they are first party (and these days even then).

                  I mean, Uncharted 4 is on GOG. Not The Last of Us, for some reason. That sucks.

                  I’d love to see Mario Galaxy on PC officially, but that’s not gonna happen, I’m not gonna get mad about it. But Alan Wake II? Yeah, that’ll probably make it elsewhere.

                  Ultimately all it takes for an exclusivity deal to be lifted is for the people involved to agree to lift it. That can be because the exclusivity is timed or because they got to some agreement on it. There is no fundamentally nefarious reason getting paid for exclusivity is worse than Valve being the only platform that is viable for a particular release. The impact is the same.

                  Maybe I’m just too old and can’t cope with the weird whiplash of being there to hear people rage about Final Fantasy showing up on Xbox only to then see this weird vitriol for a storefront compensating devs to get an exclusive on a game inside the same platform.

                  Like, I get being mad that you’d have to buy a different console to play a thing, but dude, it’s a free piece of software, you can just… install it.

                  Honestly, both things are sheer tribalism and I’ve never been there for it. Not since the dumb Sega vs Nintendo schoolyard nonsense.

                  • stardust@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    I mean, Uncharted 4 is on GOG. Not The Last of Us, for some reason. That sucks.

                    Uncharted was released in 2022 on steam then 2023 on GOG.

                    Sony has released on GOG later. It tends to be the trend because companies are in the mindset of PC has a lot of pirates. So selling a game without drm and an installer is not something they rush to do until they feel sales are on a downward trend.

                    Now that Sony has moved to PSN requirements future drm free plans are in question. Only way for GOG to get day 1 releases consistently would be to give up on DRM free requirements.

                    So it’s not really any surprise what the reasons may be.

                  • stardust@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 days ago

                    I prefer when there is no exclusivity to be lifted to begin with. Leads to games more likely to not take years and years for it to maybe come out. There’s already a barrier without it on the PC. Even with denuvo companies think pirates will result in lost sales.

          • stardust@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            That’s called the cost of running a DRM free storefront.

            Yakuza collection didn’t release until 2023. Companies usually do delayed releases when sales are on a downward trend if they end up releasing on GOG. And that’s a big if because of no DRM requirements.

            Unless you are a recent user of GOG, delayed releases shouldn’t be anything new and has more to do with DRM. If you want DRM free you have to be willing to accept delayed releasing or convince GOG to give up on DRM requirements if you just want games on GOG available right away.

            Stuff like denuvo exists because companies are very protective of their assets and are really reluctant to offer DRM free. That’s the main obstacles for GOG. DRM.

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 days ago

              Yeah. Because Steam has DRM. Steam IS DRM. That’s the problem it originally solved, back when Amazon was still a bookstore.

              So screw Steam and other overprotective corporations, I want my PC games DRM-free, since physical copies aren’t an option (which is my console solution, thank you very much). They can come meet my requirements or I will continue to prioritize GOG where I can and be annoyed at the lack of a GOG release otherwise. I don’t want GOG to give up on the DRM requirement, I want them to get so popular that publishers have to comply with it whether they like it or not.

              So from that perspective, if Epic and Steam want to have a pissing contest, I’m in full “let them fight” mode. Who cares.

              • stardust@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 days ago

                Sorry but companies were trying DRM even before them using stuff like rotating paper wheels before DRM tech improved. Sony even installed root kits for music CDs. Denuvo was created because it was believed DRM options weren’t strong enough and some companies use additional DRM on top of denuvo.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Yeah, and they were all failing at it.

                  Until Steam.

                  We actually used to be a bit generally mad about it. Plenty of big declarations about skipping Half-Life 2, when that used mandatory Steam authentication for the first time. A bit of a feeding frenzy to crack it in retaliation, too.

                  Being old makes it harder to get super mad about this.

                  • stardust@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    There was the whole pc games are dead claims even when steam started becoming bigger.

                    I just don’t see this utopia you believe it would be without steam. I just see me having a console and not bothering with a pc due to lack of games.

            • Ashtear@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Zero DRM isn’t the only reason games aren’t published on GOG right away, and that may not even be the main reason for the countless games that release day one without Denuvo.

              GOG also doesn’t have the best infrastructure for pushing updates. Stories abound of it being a slow process, whether physically uploading the files or authentication taking a while. Invariably, game updates will show up later on GOG than they will on Steam. GOG also has a very consumer-friendly return policy. All that, combined with it being simply a smaller marketplace, doesn’t place it well in cost-benefit analysis.