This is the first time I’m seeing a way to host a full Bluesky network, I think. It seems like a big step towards full federation beyond appviews and personal data servers.

  • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The entire point is that your pds can interact with multiple “instances” of bluesky or whatever other apps people build on the protocol.

    For example there is a reddit/hn clone that people can post on (keeping their same identity) when the official bluesky service goes down. The reddit clone is fully independent from the twitter clone, but they use the same protocol and (unlike AP) the same hosting and authentication infrastructure.

    Whereas on Lemmy and mastodon, my accounts are totally separate. And unlike AP, your data lives on your own pds and is never hostage to the owner of the instance that actually runs the load bearing interactivity. If they become compromised or shut down you can switch to another. No cooperation from the old owner required (unlike activitypub).

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      in other words, if bluesky goes titsup you can take your pds, and set it to another relay. but then when the original bluesky comes back up you are dark on that instance. thats not decentralization. thats islands of twitter that you can switch between.

      you will not be able to interact with multiple bluesky instances simultaneously.

      • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Thats the opposite of what I said. You can use the same data with multiple services at the same time, in fact this is already possible. The whole thing would be kinda pointless otherwise.