• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Shen told The Register 4G feature phones have until recently used the QQVGA standard for their displays – meaning developers only had 160 x 120 pixels to work with. QVGA jumps to 320 x 240 resolution, which he believes makes accessing the web on a feature phone at least a little bit more appealing.

    I cannot imagine browsing the web on 320x240, let alone 160x120.

    While I could see this being used in specific uses cases (for children, people with legal restrictions) and in the entry level market in some developing countries, I don’t think feature phones can “rise again”.

    I am sure the people who are buying these 4G feature phones will switch to a regular super budget smartphone as soon they are able to find the money for it.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Back when phones with 160x120 screens were common, you used websites that were designed for them and they worked pretty well. The sites were mostly text, which was a good thing because 2G was slow and data was expensive.

    • dotslashme@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Low resolution is less of a problem if you want content only. If you can live with pages that have all visual elements taken away, then resolution is much less of an issue.