• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    The example videos are pretty good. Only a few had obvious tells (like the Taylor Swift one), and the rest seemed pretty human-like.

    But before everyone goes out and invests in OmniHuman-1 systems, remember that marketing campaigns always show the best they could make, not the average case most people are likely to get. Will it be good enough to trick the average consumer who’s not looking that hard? Maybe. I guess we’ll have to see.

    But if all these generative models are so designed to replace the people upon whose videos they’re based, who/what will train the next generation of models, I wonder?

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      But if all these generative models are so designed to replace the people upon whose videos they’re based, who/what will train the next generation of models, I wonder?

      Maybe we hit a regular cycle…

      IE Data is all trained on real video, gets good enough that humans cannot differentiate. Real video becomes rare, AIs are now training on AI videos. Result… AI video becomes effectively copy of copy of copy of copy… degredation becomes obvious. as mistakes are now compounding. AI developers have to start creating and introducing un-tampered video to train with. AI starts to get better.