• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Ugh, greedy Valve making you spend $0 to buy the base game

    [Edit] ok I read the article after making that joke and I see that it applies to several other valve games, not all of which are free to play

    • Bubs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Lol. It’s so greedy of them!

      Jokes aside. It’s an interesting distinction to make. Even though the source code is freely available, it doesn’t mean developers have free reign to do anything they want like they could with open source software. Apart from special circumstances, everything made with the source code will still be mods.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You can’t do whatever you want with open source either. One big stipulation of copyleft licenses is the share-alike clause, which means you can’t make modifications and then decide your program is now closed-source, so it protects the code from being enclosed again.

        I mean yes you can make whatever modifications you want, generally, but it’s not totally unrestricted.

        • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Im honestly a really big fan of copyleft. I think that it seems more “fair” in a system that requires sacrifice to make progress.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It does harken back to the original HL mod scene though - some high quality stuff came out of that (and valve picked up the Devs too)