• Schneemensch@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. This is what the person you are responding to is saying as well.

      They state that the above definition of socialism is wrong as it defines it as a from of capitalism with social features. But under the condition that this is meant he would move into these countries.

      • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s actually not even that. The Wikipedia page talks about free and mixed market in socialism.

        That’s capitalism.

        It uses the word literally.

    • xe3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes… Please reread my last comment more slowly… particularly the first two paragraphs.

      • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I swear. This place is way more toxic than Reddit.

        I can’t imagine someone being so condescending there on a topic like this.

        Please read the Wikipedia article. We don’t have to agree that Wikipedia is an ultimate source of truth, but it is a pretty good article.

        I don’t think I’ll be able to communicate anything more to someone who tells me to “read more slowly”.

        • Pelicanen@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re the one who responded to their comment without actually reading it, why are you complaining about them?