China forced Apple to remove any app where the developer isn’t registered in China. Meaning they asked Apple to remove 95% of the apps and games available in the App Store.

Poor iPhone users, basically they will get a “wechat handheld” and that’s it…

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Apple is to blame too. They created a device that gives them so much power to make such lockdowns possible in the first place. The only proper response from Apple should be “we would really like to do it, but we can’t be sure users won’t install those apps outside of our store”.

    Something like that should not be possible with universal computing devices. This is why freedom to install any OS you want on mobile devices is more important than ever.

    • antizero99@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why I never had anything more than an original ipod classic. Android let’s you do whatever the fuck you want with your own device. Don’t like having Google all over your phone? You can install roms with no Google services and use other app stores.

        • antizero99@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          But, that wasn’t your only choice for a device. Android runs on basically anything and you have plenty of options for devices that let you do what you want with it.

          Basically, the bootloader being locked is a manufacturer problem and not an android problem. Buy a different phone, smartphones have fully matured at this point. Grab a pixel 7 or 7 pro for a couple of hundred bucks and make that device your biotch.

          • june 🌿@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I didn’t look into it beforehand because i was naive and my previous devices were unlocked so i assumed this would be the same. And it’s even more frustrating because while this phone in other regions is unlocked, specifically my canadian model is locked. I won’t be getting another phone any time soon, but yeah, ill be more careful in the future. Just sucks that manufacturers still do this sporadically

            • antizero99@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That wasn’t an attack on you specifically. Most people don’t need to know nor care if they can unlock the bootloader. We need some kind of federal mandate/law/whatever that says that they have to be unlocked and people can do what they want with the $1k+ devices they buy. It’s not even a question with a pc, you can even buy prebuilt systems with no OS or with linux installed if you choose.

              This is why I have been a so called Google fanboy/super fan for what feels like a couple of decades. First nexus and now pixel because I’m guaranteed to be able to install whatever flavor of android exists for whatever phone I am using (if I so choose), I haven’t played with roms in years but it’s an option if I feel like it and I’m considering doing it for my work phone, get that shit running as lean as possible, no need for 99% of the Google apps that come with it.

              • june 🌿@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s a galaxy S20 FE, but the SM-G781W specifically

                Last i checked on xda dev forums it was an exception to the bootloader unlocks

          • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Android runs on basically anything

            Sure, but lots of really great software doesn’t run on Android. In fact, none of the apps I use regularly on my iPhone are available on Android.

            • antizero99@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t believe that for a second. Some specific apps are only on one platform or the other but every app has a ton of alternatives that do the exact same thing.

              I’m not sure if you are trolling, shilling, astroturfing, whatnot but either way that argument is disingenuous at best.

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              none of the apps I use regularly on my iPhone are available on Android.

              Uh, yeah. That’s the point. It wouldn’t be Apple’s walled garden if you could just access those apps outside of iOS! You’re just used to that being the status quo…

            • averyminya@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              In fact, none of the apps I use regularly on my iPhone are available on Android.

              Okay, so… Apollo for iOS wasn’t available on Android but it was far from the only android app for reddit available.

              So you’ll have to explain what you mean. I find it hard to believe that there are apps on iOS that have functionality that doesn’t exist on Android. I can however definitely think of a few examples of what you’re talking about. In iOS I want able to find a way to interface with car maintenance software, or to connect to USB devices, or to visualize WiFi signal strength in AR. Or loading songs onto an SD card… or use wired headphones while charging my phone.

              Seems like a pretty weird limitation.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Web is the universal open platform, and China just blocks it with a firewall 🤷‍♂️.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you have universal devices Web cannot be blocked at all, you can install different browser or share websites via physical media, you can fit whole Wikipedia on SD Card. Same with overall computer networks, you can run a cable to your neighbor, unless you want to do it on a mass scale.

        But I think you mean the Internet (please, don’t confuse Web and Internet), which is in fact very limited on ISPs side.

        This is the difference. While with computers you can only censor what is done by them on public network (cables on the street, radio, etc.), with jail like iPhone you can also censor what is happening on the device itself. Those devices are dangerous and Apple made a big mistreatment for the world by creating iPhone like that.

        • realharo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You need to look at this from a practical standpoint.

          The vast majority of phone apps are not local-only. They are merely the frontend to services provided by some company - e.g. a Reddit app is really about Reddit the service, a food delivery app is about the service, not the locally running code, etc.

          Apple controls what users can and cannot install on devices made by them, but the web and things like PWA are an alternative that would be viable for some portion of these.

          You can make a web app that can be added as an icon on the homescreen, can access the camera, location, notifications, storage, authentication (e.g. require fingerprint), etc. It still can’t do everything native apps can do, but it would be good enough for a good portion of popular apps.

          But in China, that is not really possible without the government’s approval either, because China requires the same kind of registration and an ICP license for websites, otherwise things will get blocked. Which, even if you could install anything you want on a device, would effectively limit you to purely local-only apps anyway.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s stopping China from saying - “if you want to sell iPhones in China, disable sideloading”?

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing. The point is first, they shouldn’t be able to do it for devices already sold.

        Second, Apple is the one developing technologies to make phones jails even without goverment looking. If Apple hadn’t done it for past years and China would force them now, then still next couple of generations of devices would be trivial to jailbrake, beacuse those locks won’t be as mature.

      • TheCalzoneMan@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only thing stopping them is their own incompetency. Truly a thin wall, but as their older generations start dying off we’ll see that wall broken down.

        • TwinTusks@outpost.zeuslink.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          as their older generations start dying off we’ll see that wall broken down.

          We wish, but we expect the younger generations would be the same if not more strict (think Kim).

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like Dell selling a PC that only allows Dell approved OS systems to be installed. No Linux or Windows, only DellOS so they can get all the advertising revenue from showing ads on your pc

    • Toes♀@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That behaviour is great for elderly customers I find. But I agree they shouldn’t be allowed to control the phones like that.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Apple follows EU guidelines and opens their ecosystem to third-party app stores, like f Droid. Then this really won’t be an issue

    • Feyter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m quite sure they will only allow this in EU (and maybe USA). If they do allow this in China, Regime will most probably ban every alternative app Store… if this is not already banned.

      Thought and prayers to the people of china. I feel like they lost everything in 1989. Still hope they find the strength to get rid of this depressing system.

      • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thought and prayers to the people of china. I feel like they lost everything in 1989. Still hope they find the strength to get rid of this depressing system.

        I feel the same about the US.

        • Feyter@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know if this was just a joke or you really mean it that way.

          I would partially agree that there are a lot of similarities between Mao and Trump, but current situation in USA is nowhere near current situation in china.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure if this would work in China, but… I have a de-Googled bootloader-locked Huawei tablet (don’t ask, it was cheap)… in the EU, but had to jump through some hoops to make it usable… and kind of did it, thanks to F-Droid, APKPure, and Gspace.

        iPhones might be more tightly locked, but maybe people will find similar workarounds.

        • stevehobbes@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the issue is they’ll have to do much more work to get to those stores if they become remotely popular as a vector for bypassing censorship.

          The minute people are using f-droid at scale to bypass controls and censorship, f-droid is going to get firewalled if it isn’t already.

          China isn’t on the open internet. It’s a game of whack-a-mole for them, but they’re pretty good at it and throw a lot of bodies at this.

          The average user won’t be jumping through the hoops required to make this work.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            F-Droid has censorship resistance built in, it lets you share apps locally via bluetooth. It would be difficult, but I can imagine a bunch of protestors sharing apps, getting a mesh communication network going (like briar), all without clearnet access.

            Not to mention lots of countries have “shut down internet access” in their protest playbook, so the freedom of speech, human rights, tech-bros are building the technology to work without internet.

      • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t android phones sold in China? Because they have been able to sideload apps since forever

        • Feyter@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          From what I read technically “Android” is used as the most popular smartphone OS in China. But that’s only because android is the foundation of costume Chinese OS that comes without any google services (nice) but is also highly restricted against side loading. Of course like always ways should exist to workaround those restrictions.

          But to be honest getting information about all the restrictions people in china need to suffer from getting harder l with every day since they get encapsulated more and more.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They removed google but added their own state spyware. If you block the phone from phoning home (with Tracker Control, for example), the phone will still collect and save (into a user-inaccessible part of the phone) all those metrics, and eventually die, since it can’t store any more. I got 6 months out of my Chinese phone, before it filled up its metrics memory and automatically shut down permanently.

    • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Third party app stores have zero bearing on this matter. China wants every developer to be registered. If new app stores were allowed, then those stores would have to comply and have all their developers registered.

      This has nothing to do with App Store monopolies. Not even sure how the two got mixed together.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apple makes the situation worse, by having an exclusive app store, and not allowing people to load apps directly. Without a developer key, having to renew every week, etc it’s effectively not allowing.

        F Droid is currently accessible from China, I believe. Even if it isn’t, you can share Android apps via Bluetooth, nearby. It’s a far more partitionable and repairable situation with f Droid then with the Apple store.

        So if iOS allows other app stores access, then that will give people more options inside of China

        • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The number of stores are irrelevant, not sure how you keep missing this. And I’m not sure why you think just because you have more stores, it will somehow circumvent the new law.

          If you add 3 more App Stores, the outcome will be most apps will be sold in all of them, I mean why wouldn’t you want your product in as many stores as possible? Again, not sure why you think more stores means anything or can be used to circumvent Chinese laws.

          And China won’t forget about F Droid. If they want devs registered, then it’s going to hit their nation, not a specific company. They will all be brought under the new rule. One store, hundred stores, google, Apple, whomever.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            The stores aren’t relevant, the operating system allowing apps to run that aren’t signed by an Apple certificate is the important thing

      • beesyrup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given the choice to sideload apps, I’m sure it wouldn’t matter what store you get it from–just the fact that you can install the apps. I’m sure people can skirt developer registration.

        • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. The store is irrelevant, registration is what China is after.

          Also, you’re wrong about developers bypassing registration. That kind of shit isn’t possible in China.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless of course the app makes API requests to its backend, which is blocked in China.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Corporate monopoly over a device (walled garden) means that a government authority has only one entity they need to “convince” to have full control over it.

  • BitOneZero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We are in an Information War and I don’t see enough peer to peer friendships being made between The People of China and everyday people in USA, South America, Africa, North America, Europe, Australia, etc.

    I don’t see China people on GitHub and YouTube like I did 5 years ago. Maybe the real war is power over technology and all of humanity isn’t winning. Isn’t that another way to interpret Climate Change, an education mistake on a global scale? Advertising and marketing defeating science teachers? The love for the singe-passenger automobile 9 to 5 commute job - exceeding the reality of global climate physics?

    Like they say in The Orville - Dolly Parton was a hero! she basically turned out to be a great teacher, like Mr. Rogers on the true problems of childhood. 9 to 5 was kind of like showing children what your divorced single mother was having to go through. Not to say that fit the relationships in the film itself, but the office environment of white collar world. The technology of the Office Workplace and the era of typewriters as business machines. EDIT: It’s a real War: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6Do6VWUxyg

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      A problem I have with Dolly Parton is that her partner company, Herschend Enterprises, bought the Vancouver Aquarium during the pandemic, and tried to strangle the marine rescue component of the aquarium to death.

      She might be wholesome but the businesses she runs with aren’t.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems big. IPhones seem like they are kinda the main western luxury and status symbol in China. Now they’re not really any better than Android phones in terms of apps and being able to bypass the firewall.

    • loki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now they’re not really any better than Android phones in terms of apps and being able to bypass the firewall

      What does this mean? You have been able to sideload apps on Android for a decade. How were the iPhones better in terms of apps and being able to bypass the firewall before?

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t used a Chinese phone, but from what I understand, Chinese Android phones don’t come with play store and have Chinese app stores only.

        Sideloading is an option, but apk sites can just be firewalled, so the ability to have the full apple apps store accessible through the firewall was pretty big.

        • loki@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have a chinese friend and when I asked them to look for signal, whatsapp, or telegram, the apple app store had them all but they didn’t work after they installed it. They just got a loading screen or couldn’t sign up.

          Android custom ROM scene was big back when I was rooting and playing with ROMs, as people found how to root their obscure phones by translating chinese forum posts. You don’t have to access apk sites, there are other ways to share apks. Last I heard fdroid was accessible from China as far back as 2014 until recently.

          Here’s a quote from fdroid themselves.

          In the Chinese app store market five to ten commonly used app stores, and yet even the largest has less than a majority market share. Most Chinese people have more than one app store on their phone, so there is no monolith there, whereas “outside of China, Apple and Google control more than 95 percent of the app store market share”.

          https://f-droid.org/en/2022/11/23/why-curation-and-decentralization-is-better-than-millions-of-apps.html

          Do some research before you perpetuate misinformation that confirms your bias.

          But fuck the CCP for authoritarianism.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair enough, I guess they were about the same once you had a vpn working.

            But yeah, it seems really bad that the luxury IPhones are getting so nerfed.

    • Crotaro@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now they’re not really any better than Android phones in terms of apps and being able to bypass the firewall.

      I don’t know about the Android capabilities in China but this move makes it seem to me that IPhone has now almost become a paperweight with in-built clock, messaging/phoning and heavily restricted browser.

  • stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    So seems like even though privacy is talked up so much for Apple it might only be true for western countries. Best phone for overseas might be one with an unlockable bootloader that allows you to change the OS from the stock one.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    Apple’s iPhone App Store in China is getting a whole lot more locked down.

    China recently updated an existing online software regulation to lay out strict criteria for app stores and apps in the country, and after looking for ways around it, Apple has started to comply.

    Now, as Apple honors the regulation, it closes a loophole that had let iPhone users in China download and, with a VPN, use apps that the government there has blocked for most or all of the country, like WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube.

    Reuters writes that, in order for an app to qualify for an ICP license, they are “effectively” required to host their back end in China.

    Apple was pushing back on the requirement, but app stores from Tencent, Huawei, and others had apparently already complied with the rule.

    We asked Apple for a comment and whether the rule has affected any apps yet but did not receive a response by press time.


    Saved 41% of original text.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sadly doesn’t seem like it’ll help

      Last month, China announced it would require an ICP license in order for apps to be listed in all mobile app stores. Now, as Apple honors the regulation, it closes a loophole that had let iPhone users in China download and, with a VPN, use apps that the government there has blocked for most or all of the country, like WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube.

    • clutchmattic@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Normal VPN doesn’t work because China firewall uses deep packet inspection that looks for signs that traffic is being tunneled and then blocks the IPs involved. On the other hand, VPN use can land users in jail as well

  • alfonsojon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I look forward to a day where third party app stores are allowed to exist on iOS, should it ever come.