College professors are going back to paper exams and handwritten essays to fight students using ChatGPT::The growing number of students using the AI program ChatGPT as a shortcut in their coursework has led some college professors to reconsider their lesson plans for the upcoming fall semester.

  • lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI is a tool that can indeed be of great benefit when used properly. But using it without comprehending and verifying the source material can be downright dangerous (like those lawyers citing fake cases). The point of the essay/exam is to test comprehension of the material.

    Using AI at this point is like using a typewriter in a calligraphy test, or autocorrect in a spelling and grammar test.

    Although asking for handwritten essays does nothing to combat use of AI. You can still generate content and then transcribe it by hand.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That argument is great until someone gets maimed or killed because the “AI” got it wrong and the user didn’t know enough to realize.

      You know idiots with AI do that all the time everyday right?

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      My broader point (in your metaphor) is that calligraphy tests are irrelevant at this point. The world changed. Theres not going back.

      • ratskrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        A calligraphy test is not irrelevant if you are studying to LEARN calligraphy. If you are arguing that calligraphy as a subject doesnt need to exist then fine then don’t study it. But you don’t learn it by asking AI to do it for you.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Typewriters are also irrelevant today. It was an analogy. I agree that AI can be used in some evaluations, depending what you’re evaluating.

        I allow and encourage Googling for information when I interview software engineering candidates. I don’t consider it “cheating”, on the contrary. Being able to unblock themselves is one of the skills they should have. They will be using external help when doing their job, so why should the test be any different.

        But that also reminds me now that I actually once had a candidate using generative AI in the coding interview. It did feel like cheating when it was a the level of asking for the full solution, not just help getting unblocked. It didn’t help at all though because the candidate didn’t even have enough skill to tell the good suggestions from the bad ones or what they needed to iterate on.