The tiniest of silver linings is that there’s a good chance of getting rid of the NFA once and for all. However, I would gladly push that date back if it meant the big shit bill hadn’t passed.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The removal of the $200 tax for suppressors, SBRs is a very welcome change for the firearms community. Hoping to see the lawsuit here completely kill this portion of the NFA.

      Putting hearing safety equipment behind such large barriers has always been asinine.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        The removal of the tax was pointless. I don’t run suppressors because of a tax, I don’t run them because the amount of paperwork and laws I could accidentally break is insane. It’s a convoluted mess of bullshit.

        • ssroxnak@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          So all the paperwork and registry is confirm that you paid the tas. The lawsuit basically says there’s no point in any of that since the tax is gone.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Guessing time will tell if this actually goes through. I find it insane that countries with massive amounts of gun control literally require suppressors to be used and they’re like cheap accessories you can buy as basically an afterthought in the gun stores. Why we have braindead politicians thinking suppressors magically make the firearm noiseless is crazy to me.