• WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we have the tech to change people’s brains in such a way, what else will it gets used on? Ethically, there’s differences between pedophilia and other sexual preferences but I don’t know if there’s any biological differences. Given conversion camps are already a problem despite not working, I can’t see how they wouldn’t become a bigger problem if they did actually do what they claimed…

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have the tech right now to shoot people dead. It’s just tech, create laws about what’s acceptable to do with it and what’s not.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even when conversion camp stuff is illegal, people still try it. Even if just DIY abuse (which is also illegal and still common). Simply not having the tech may be preferable to having the tech/knowledge, making it illegal to use it, and then people use it illegally anyways. If child abuse in general was something that could have just not been invented, not inventing it would be far superior to inventing it and then making it illegal.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This thread is about how to regulate AI-generated child porn, that’s going to require creating laws too.

          What’s your proposed alternative to using laws to regulate tech?

          • HerbalGamer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was just saying that this tech that shoots people dead isn’t really regulated all too well in certain parts of the world.