Has this been done somewhere?

Any other ways to make it look better than tearing it down? Whole bunch of fake glass?

  • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some graffiti is, I think, traditional at this point and a good mural can do wonders to humanize it. I have a feeling that patterns are not actually going to improve it though. The problem is often the form rather than what the material looks like. You could paint it to look like a row of thatched cottages but that would to me be even more depressing.

    You are also then committed to repainting it regularly or it’s going to quickly look even worse than when you started.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plants, especially vines, tend to go great with brutalism. The living contrast adds color and life to durable structures.

      • credit crazy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Vines in my opinion are great dicore maybe that’s because I’m a sucker for abandoned building vibes idk what it is that makes me love looking at abandoned buildings it’s one of the reasons I love portal 2’s abandoned sci Fi look if I wasn’t for the high heights and turrets I would love to explore abandoned apeture

    • corroded@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Graffiti is vandalism. It is not traditional, and it’s not art. It’s a crime; there is no exception unless it’s done on private property with permission from the property owner.

        • lars@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imagine someone buys the Mona Lisa and declares that its not art and da Vinci grafittied their privately owned piece of canvas. Artists around the globe in shambles.

        • corroded@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right, but you have to draw the line somewhere. If someone decides to light a building on fire and call it “performance art,” nobody considers it anything but a crime. If someone spray-paints a vulgarity on the side of a school, few would call that “art,” but a mural on the side of a concrete wall is “street art.” The subject matter and the quality of the painting doesn’t make the determination between art and vandalism; it’s just vandalism.

      • zero_iq@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How many more millennia are needed before you’ll consider graffiti an established tradition?

        How do you feel about even newer practices like “farming” and “democracy”? Do you think they’ll catch on too? Or just new-fangled nonsense?