Snorf@reddthat.com to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 year agoCan a company can itself Twitter now?message-squaremessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up155arrow-down1message-squareCan a company can itself Twitter now?Snorf@reddthat.com to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSnorf@reddthat.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up38arrow-down1·1 year agoOne of those cans should be a call
minus-squareChainweasel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up48·1 year agoYou can edit titles on Lemmy! And short answer is no. Even though Musk isn’t using the name Twitter for his social media platform, he still owns the rights to the name and the trademark, and can sue anyone using it.
minus-squareSnorf@reddthat.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down4·1 year agoGood to know man, but I’m leaving the can.
minus-squaredustyData@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoCan you lose Trademarks if you haven’t used or enforced them for a long while? the way copyright can enter public domain unless renewed and enforced?
minus-squarekirklennon@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoYes, but X is still using “Twitter.” It takes an extended period of complete abandonment before you can petition to have the trademark canceled.
minus-squarecurse4444@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoim high af and i read your title 5 times and had no idea wtf i read lmao
minus-squareall-knight-party@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoHow many cans could a can call can if a can call could call cans?
minus-squareNarrrz@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agohow much chuck could a chuck-wood wood, if a chuck-wood would wood chuck?
minus-squareall-knight-party@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI may have to rethink my understanding of the English language
minus-squarehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWait until you learn what “kuusi palaa” means in Finnish.
minus-squaresquiblet@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI think it would work as “if a can could call cans cans”
minus-squareall-knight-party@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoI just went with the one that was more satisfying to say and matched the original tongue twister Edit: I am idiot
minus-squaredeleted@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoOne mans can is another mans call
minus-squarelitchralee@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThere’s a Texas Hold’em Poker joke somewhere in here
One of those cans should be a call
You can edit titles on Lemmy! And short answer is no. Even though Musk isn’t using the name Twitter for his social media platform, he still owns the rights to the name and the trademark, and can sue anyone using it.
Good to know man, but I’m leaving the can.
deleted by creator
Can you lose Trademarks if you haven’t used or enforced them for a long while? the way copyright can enter public domain unless renewed and enforced?
Yes, but X is still using “Twitter.” It takes an extended period of complete abandonment before you can petition to have the trademark canceled.
im high af and i read your title 5 times and had no idea wtf i read lmao
who called a can?
How many cans could a can call can if a can call could call cans?
how much chuck could a chuck-wood wood, if a chuck-wood would wood chuck?
I may have to rethink my understanding of the English language
Wait until you learn what “kuusi palaa” means in Finnish.
I think it would work as “if a can could call cans cans”
I just went with the one that was more satisfying to say and matched the original tongue twister
Edit: I am idiot
One mans can is another mans call
There’s a Texas Hold’em Poker joke somewhere in here