Highlights: The White House issued draft rules today that would require federal agencies to evaluate and constantly monitor algorithms used in health care, law enforcement, and housing for potential discrimination or other harmful effects on human rights.

Once in effect, the rules could force changes in US government activity dependent on AI, such as the FBI’s use of face recognition technology, which has been criticized for not taking steps called for by Congress to protect civil liberties. The new rules would require government agencies to assess existing algorithms by August 2024 and stop using any that don’t comply.

  • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Reading comprehension, you lack it.

    Your life, liberty and health aren’t under attack, so you don’t give a shit about the life, liberty, or health of others. That’s what, “fuck you, I got mine,” means.

    Edit: Also, the irony of you talking about, “everything you have will be slowly eroded away,” while proudly saying you don’t care about the erosion of the rights of others is not lost on me.

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s just you being pissed I don’t vote for other people before myself.

      Fuck you got mine would be if, on knowing issues I don’t care about are resolved, I started voting against people’s rights.

      This is “fuck you, don’t got mine”. Once I got mine the fuck you will go away.

      • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        But you’ve said it yourself, you would vote against other people’s rights if it meant fewer things, “getting in the way of open source algorithms.”

        • bioemerl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I wouldn’t vote for AI if the advancement of AI required we don’t mandate police cameras.

          But it doesn’t. The Democrats can easily both support rights and AI. It’s their choice not to and if they make that choice they lose my vote.

          • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Need I remind you of your initial comment?

            Delay llama 3 and I’m voting for whoever runs against Biden. No exceptions, I will become a single issue voter and this will be my issue.

            No exceptions also includes even if the person running against Biden wants to take away your right to vote or bodily autonomy.

            • bioemerl@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Democrats can easily both support rights and AI. It’s their choice not to and if they make that choice they lose my vote.

              • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No exceptions, I will become a single issue voter and this will be my issue.

                Edit: I think you’re starting to realize that you’ve blustered yourself into a corner.

                  • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You’ve said, repeatedly, that you would vote for AI over rights. It’s your single issue, and have even pointed out that Democrats can support both, but if they don’t support AI you’ll vote against them regardless of what their opponents support.