Baker’s testimony shows that Mozilla depends so much on its deal with Google for revenue that “the biggest loser of a DOJ win in the Google case would be Mozilla.”

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see how this case against Google is a threat to Firefox’s existence

    It’s not like they can lie under oath and say they left the contract with Yahoo that pays more to be with Google because they’re a Monopoly

    This playing into Google’s argument that they are the best is just nice for them

    I am aware that popularity and quality aren’t related at all though

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      if the judge ultimately sides with the DOJ and orders Google to break up its search business, not only could Mozilla lose revenue, but Baker’s salary could potentially take a big hit, too. Baker confirmed that her salary—$2.5 million in 2020—increased after the Google deal was renewed that year.

      According to Dyall’s thread, Baker also testified that she thought Mozilla might be forced into a “death spiral” if it is stuck partnering with Microsoft for search as an outcome of the trial.

      It’s their own assessment that it’s an existential threat, I’m just agreeing with it. Google is absolutely the biggest factor in their sustainability as a business.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well that would be a pretty silly way of dealing with a monopoly

        Google should be broken up into many different search engines rather than just picking/choosing which browsers get which search engine