• knopwob@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imho the main argument for github is that it lowers the hurdle for new ane ad-hoc contributions like issues. I’m problably too lazy to registsr a new account for your instance just to open a bug report.

    I’d love a federated git/issue/wiki thing

    • xoggy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my opinion that sounds like a plus. People that are too lazy to register an account to put in a code merge request or report a bug aren’t going to be writing quality code or quality bug reports.

        • xoggy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Working in a busy codebase for a long time when I have to spend time a non-trivial amount of time triaging through tickets I can’t reproduce that is taking time away from legitimate bug and request tickets I can be working on. It can seriously lead to burnout.

          • jack@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t have to fix every issue, there are also other volunteers who might look at it.

            If the reproducible instructions aren’t clear enough or are missing, just ask for more info. If they can’t deliver on that, close it or just move on and other people might take care of it

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      GitHub will just serve as code mirror. Patches and bugs will still go through Mozilla’s usually channels.