By Zayatoon comics

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey, i hate the british too, but the article doesn’t directly blame the british for the famines and it also includes famines that took place in non-british held or administrated territories.

    Nevertheless, it does point out that in many cases, british administration worsened the situation.

    • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nevertheless, it does point out that in many cases, british administration worsened the situation.

      To be fair… They were only practising for how they’d treat modern Britain.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It also just one territory, I’m sure the Irish also have a few bones to pick.

      Though speaking of time advantage, the best answer might be “mosquitos”, and while “blood sucking insects” could be a name for british colonists, they didn’t spread malaria since the dawn of humanity