• Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    197
    ·
    1 year ago

    …the company dies.

    Oh for fucks sakes we have an edgel0rd over here. You can just stop watching the channel if you don’t like them.

    • ShunkW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      151
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s nothing wrong with hoping an unethical company goes under.

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        48
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe, but spare a thought for the ordinary people who would lose their jobs as a result.

          • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Again, that may be the case, but it’s still not good for people to lose their jobs in the first place.

            Especially not in this economy.

            • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I hope every unethical company goes over and everyone who works at all of them remains unemployed for at least 3 months actually. Unethical companies = employees often complacent and part of the problem.

              I don’t see why you want to defend this

              • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not defending the company or the actions of whoever is involved in misconduct. But I also don’t believe in guilt by association.

                Sorry for caring about people’s livelihoods.

                • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It isn’t guilt by association. It’s not caring about several people losing their jobs as a result of their employer’s decision to sexually harass women. The few jobs lost isn’t that big of a deal compared to the trauma the female employees were put through. Those people will have no problem finding new work.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My thoughts go to the dependency on jobs for survival but that leads into a conversation about AI, the end of enough jobs for humans and the need for universal basic income. Job loss doesn’t much affect my choice to interact with a corporation or wish for it to change (which may affect jobs).

      • trachemys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        67
        ·
        1 year ago

        They seem to have an excess of testosterone and are too sloppy, but unethical and worthy of cancellation is typical internet outrage over reaction.

        • ShunkW@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being invested in a company and giving glowing reviews to their products and only offering critiques of their competitors is pretty fucking unethical

    • dtc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can’t hear what you’re saying with linus’ stringy cock in your mouth, mate.

    • rizoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      An unethical company that allows it’s employees to be assaulted doesn’t need to exist.