And don’t say humans, too obvious, too cynical.
I’d delete mosquitos.
The only negative effect I can think of would be fish won’t have mosquito larvae to eat and their diet would have to shift.
And don’t say humans, too obvious, too cynical.
I’d delete mosquitos.
The only negative effect I can think of would be fish won’t have mosquito larvae to eat and their diet would have to shift.
Most positive effects on the planet but not humans?
Cattle, they’re a major source of greenhouse gasses, as are all the industries built around growing, processing, and transporting them.
absolutely
https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food
https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000010
That would be such a boon for the planet. The biomass of cattle (that is, if you piled them all on a scale and got their weight) far surpasses the biomass of wild mammals. All wild mammals, land and sea, combined. (They’re only about 4% of total mammal biomass.)
Cattle, and the things you describe, are the result of human intervention…