And don’t say humans, too obvious, too cynical.

I’d delete mosquitos.

The only negative effect I can think of would be fish won’t have mosquito larvae to eat and their diet would have to shift.

  • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Particularly disease-carrying mosquitos have been assessed to be unimportant to ecosystems. Although, it’s worth noting that outside of those few species, they don’t primarily feed on blood, but rather nectar. They take blood once during their reproductive cycle.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      important to ecosystems

      Because they’re invasive species to most places in the world. They’re important for their original ecosystem.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Are they? I thought I’d heard this in an African context specifically. The jist was that there’s endless roughly equivalent species that don’t do multiple blood meals, which would basically just take their place for everything but spreading pathogens.