• Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      A gun would add some serious weight to your pack, which would often mean you don’t cover ground as easily.

      It’d be fun to see an apocalypse where everyone packed a gun to steal from everyone else but no one packed any food.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are they? I’ll admit, my experience is limited but it’s seemed to me even pistols are a considerable weight, especially compared to other survival/camping supplies.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Depends what you consider considerable. For example Glock G19 is 855 g (30.16 oz) with a full magazine, to me that doesn’t seem much. Especially if you consider how valuable of a tool it could be. Hopefully you’d have at least twice that weight in water alone.

          • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, if you’ve ever done some serious hiking you know you wouldn’t want to haul around a gun. Also, imagine being in a shootout while wearing a massive backpack.

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            1.5 lbs, loaded, on average. Even I overestimated by quite a lot but it still wouldn’t have made a major difference.

            How the hell heavy did you think guns were? Were you adding on the mental weight of being able to easily take a life? Because that traditionally does convert to mass very readily.