• ChexMax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What? Like all appliances break easier and are un-repairable while only performing the same or marginally better than their old counterparts.

    Also clothes are way less hardy (though I concede they are cheaper, often softer and don’t bleed in the washer as much) I don’t know that I’d call them better.

    • Wodge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cheap clothes are crappy. More on this story at 11.

      You can still buy well made clothes that’ll outlast the person wearing them, they just cost more.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        For a lot of things that “they don’t make like they used to,” a few companies still do make things that way, but everyone else has gone with way cheaper methods and materials. You get used to this lower price, and grumble about lower quality.

        People in the past used to have way less stuff, because it was all more expensive. For example: old houses don’t have closets because you could fit all your clothes in a single dresser. When you’re forced to buy/make expensive stuff, it had better damn well last.

        Planned obsolescence is definitely a thing, but it’s not always the sole reason cheap stuff sucks.

      • ChexMax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Expensive clothes are also lower quality / lastability. You can buy the same brand even same size pair of jeans or bra and they are totally different from even a few years ago.