• CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I guess that would explain the difficulties some apps face without push notifications and releasing APKs. These big companies want you to rely on their systems. Signal was pushing their app through play store. I don’t know if an equivalent exists, but it really needs to. We need this, combined with f-droid, so we don’t have to use spyware like the Play Store.

  • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just don’t use push, almost all of the privacy respecting apps have their own notifications

    And also, there’s ntfy for some (hope to be more widespread)

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Curious about this too. From what I could find, for those it seems like the push is being used to wake up the app and tell it to connect to the server where it grabs the data and then creates the notification locally. Even if a bare minimum is used there is room for traffic analysis, and I imagine Google can easily tell the app being targeted for the push, but it shouldn’t mean the contents of the displayed notification are necessarily what was sent through the server. It’s hard to find info without digging because consumer-facing stuff just calls every notification a push notification.

      The alternative is an app keeping a constant connection open to the server, which understandably mobile OSs don’t like. With push only the one service needs to keep an open connection to provide updates for all the apps.